Worked examples
Six real profiles, diagnosed in full
The fastest way to understand what this site does is to read a report it produced. These are real FACEIT accounts — 6,529 matches between them — captured on 2026-08-13, anonymised, and analysed line by line.
Every number on these pages is exactly as the public FACEIT API returned it. Nothing is illustrative. What is removed is identity: the nickname, the avatar and the match ids, because a permanent public page picking apart a stranger's play should not carry their name.
- 6
Top finding: Role mismatch
A Level 6 taking a quarter of the opening duels and losing three in five
The clearest case in the set. Every other stat on this profile is unremarkable; one of them is not, and it is worth about 125 ELO.
309 matches · 1,226 ELO · 50% win rate · 74.5 ADR
- 6
Top finding: Session discipline
A Level 6 whose stats are fine and whose calendar is not
Two profiles at the same level, 28 ELO apart, with completely different diagnoses. This is the one where the problem is not in the game.
447 matches · 1,254 ELO · 50% win rate · 72.1 ADR
- 8
Top finding: Map pool
A Level 8 with 507 matches on the map they are worst at
The largest sample in this set, and the clearest demonstration that a map pool is a decision, not a fact about you.
1,602 matches · 1,661 ELO · 48% win rate · 75.4 ADR
- 8
Top finding: Utility
A Level 8 twenty ELO from Level 9
The closest gap in this set. What a report looks like when the answer is "almost nothing needs to change".
1,279 matches · 1,731 ELO · 51% win rate · 74.0 ADR
- 10
Top finding: Role mismatch
A Level 10 with a 57% win rate and the worst entry balance in this set
The highest win rate of any example here, and still the most overextended. Role mismatch does not resolve itself on the way up.
522 matches · 2,041 ELO · 57% win rate · 79.4 ADR
- 10
Top finding: Session discipline
A Level 10 who lost 225 ELO in two evenings
The largest profile here, and the clearest picture of what a drawdown actually looks like in the history.
2,370 matches · 2,121 ELO · 50% win rate · 81.3 ADR
Why these are published and live reports are not
Reports for arbitrary nicknames are generated on demand, and a page generated on demand for
anyone who asks is thin content by Google's own definition — millions of near-identical
templates differing only in the numbers. Those pages carry a noindex tag and are disallowed in robots.txt, deliberately.
These six are the opposite: a fixed, small, hand-picked set, each with analysis written about that specific profile, chosen so that between them they show every finding the engine can produce. Role mismatch, utility, session discipline and map pool all appear as a top finding at least once, at more than one level, because a diagnostic tool that only ever says one thing is not diagnosing anything.
The comparison values every report uses — the per-level medians for ADR, K/D, headshot percentage, entry and clutch rates — are published in full on the baselines page, measured from 435 public profiles.
Run your own profile — free, no sign-up, no account linking.